Spottiswoode Park Residents Get S$188,000 to Design Their Own Estate Upgrades in Singapore’s First Participatory Budgeting Trial

To create a more inviting environment at void decks, resident Roy Fung suggested beautifying the tables and chairs with various themes. “Void decks tend to be places where people just pass by. I wanted to have a standout feature, such as a seaside or forest theme, that will encourage conversation among residents,” said the 57-year-old, who has been living in the estate for 25 years.

A total of S$130,000 was granted to bring his idea to life at seven void decks in the estate. The amount comprises the cost of materials, epoxy coating to seal the designs onto the tables, and labour.

Another two ideas, a reflexology pebble path and stone seats, were granted S$48,000 and S$10,000 respectively.

The resident who suggested the reflexology pebble path, Jagwinder Singh, 55, said he came up with the idea because there are many seniors in the estate. A pebble path was wellness-focused, feasible and within the budget, said Singh, who also submitted other ideas such as a garden with a pond. “This process empowers us. Rather than agencies telling us what is best for the estate, we get to play a part,” he added.

The three ideas that did not receive enough votes were for a rock climbing wall, a pickleball court and barbecue pits.

The trial gave residents a say in how funds are allocated, from proposing ideas to deciding on neighbourhood improvements. Residents were involved from the start, from identifying improvements they hoped to see to coming up with a full proposal themselves.

Six proposals were shortlisted from 162 ideas and put to a vote in July. The three winning proposals received a total of S$188,000. The total budget for the exercise, a collaboration between Tanjong Pagar Town Council and the Institute of Policy Studies, was S$200,000 and was drawn from the Future-Ready Society Impact Fund administered by the Tote Board.

Fung, who is the Residents’ Committee chairman for the estate, said he met his team of six weekly to firm up details of their proposal, from the concept to the budget and execution.

Construction of the projects is expected to start in late 2026, after tenders are called for each project.

Justin Lee, senior research fellow and head of the Policy Lab at the Institute of Policy Studies, said the trial at Spottiswoode Park was unique because it brought together residents from the public and private parts of the estate.

The nine blocks were built by the Port of Singapore Authority in the 1970s. Five were later taken over by the Housing Board while the other four remained privately owned. The private blocks were not included in the voting process for the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme, but they were involved in the participatory budgeting trial, Lee noted, adding that residents from the private blocks were glad to have a say in the amenities in their neighbourhood.

The trial ran alongside the estate’s Neighbourhood Renewal Programme but was separately funded. Twenty-six resident proposals, such as sheltered walkways and barrier-free access ramps, were also incorporated into the programme’s plans.

National Development Minister Chee Hong Tat said in a written parliamentary reply to Tanjong Pagar GRC MP Foo Cexiang in August that town councils can use their Neighbourhood Renewal Programme budget to implement estate improvement projects that residents propose and vote on, subject to technical feasibility.

Foo said he asked the question as he saw good outcomes from the trial in Spottiswoode Park, where residents felt involved in rejuvenating their estate and the process brought them closer to one another. Chee’s clarification paves the way for participatory budgeting exercises to be expanded, he added.

The pilot is part of the IPS Policy Lab’s wider work to test how Singaporeans can take a more direct role in decisions that shape their everyday environment.

IPS research fellow Nicholas Thomas said he hopes the exercise helped residents think about the collective interest of the community rather than just their own self-interest. “The usual expectation is that the Government will come in and do the fixing, but this has inadvertently crowded out the space for decision-making and, over time, the civic muscle starts to atrophy,” he said. “The exercise lets residents reclaim that space and, equally important, it required the Government to cede it.”